![]() |
Women to Watch: By
Steve LaFreniere
|
S: I used to see you at so many parties and openings. I began to think you were some sort of spy. Then I saw your book and realized I was right!
S: As in "I'm so happy I could die"?
S: You're also able to meet people this way. P: Yes. Sometimes I have also sex with them. S: Any portrait is half for the person being portrayed and half for
the artist. I've always thought that was a strange bargain. P: In this series I transform the people being portrayed into heroes
or survivors of our time...and I think being a hero in an artist’s
personal S: These are drawings made after snapshots you've taken. I've always
believed that the impetus behind taking snapshots was to claim some
tiny bit of ownership of the subject. P: So is writing fiction or a novel.. Anyway, don't you own the moment
you experience with a person or situation? It's just a different way
of visualizing. S: Do you actually enjoy all the parties and events that you go to
for your subjects? P: There are times I felt I had to go to every f'kn single party.
It almost became an addiction and going out especially late at night
made
you part of a secret union where you felt comfortable in the role of
a spy--seeing and hearing what other people are up to. I also enjoy
connecting people and being connected. But there are also times where
you’re afraid of everybody and you feel totally disconnected.
That means time to work in your studio. S: How much of the original photo do you use? P: In the end I don't really need the photograph anymore. It's more
like a crutch, a place to start. This combines with memory and I completely
lose myself to the drawing. I see myself more like an abstract artist.
I transform form and content, and try not to think. Otherwise, I would
just show the photograph instead of the drawing. S: That’s interesting, because what I most like about them is
this abstract quality they seem to produce. P: Thanks..that's exactly what I'm trying to do... S: Besides their formal considerations, these are portraits of a certain
scene in New York right now. Young people doing creative new things,
the kind that cause ripples in the larger culture. P: The nice part about that "young scene" is that you can
still see so much hope. That also carries a lot of glamour with it,
which I'm addicted to. S: Now, you also make monumental paintings from the same kinds of snapshots.
But somehow those have a rather different feel. P : Yes, and besides the more documentary aspect of my drawings , I
think painting itself is more of a mystery. There is that rhythm, which
leads to it's own rules, or like music tripping away but being in control
of an instrument. I think color, form, and surface should rule the
content. S: What’s your new project? P: It's the cover of Jimi Hendrix's "Electric Ladyland".
But I reconstructed the original photograph and put all my girlfriends
in it instead. S: Oh, the British cover with all the nude women? P: Yes. S: This is going to be a large painting? P: 9 by 18 feet. The original picture is kind of dark, and it's interesting how women looked in the '60s. They had this flesh that was really soft and not "trained". Now the bodies are like steel. So I thought, maybe I should compare this. S: Was it difficult to get the women to do it? P: No, everyone i asked wanted to be in it. They all came to the shoot.
It was like a party, and the picture turned out great. S: What differences did you discover between then and now? P: Women seem more empowered and in charge now, and I think their bodies reflect that. Also, since I came to New York I've experienced a very strong friendship between women, and I think this is also a sign of our times.
|
|